SC Holds Dealer Liable under Consumer Act for Vehicle under Warranty

[111prez]

Just read this: https://www.autoindustriya.com/auto-...da6-owner.html

"The Supreme Court (SC) has released a decision written by Associate Justice Marvic M. V. F. Leonen regarding the case of a 2011 Mazda6. On July 31, 2014, the owner of the vehicle, Alexander Caruncho, filed a complaint with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) against Mazda Quezon Avenue over a defect with the car; specifically the rack and pinion steering system.

The decision by the SC reaffirms a 2017 order by the Court of Appeals (CA) and a 2014 adjudication by the DTI that the consumer be given a refund. Mazda Quezon Avenue had elevated the matter to the SC over technicalities, but the court still ruled in favor of the consumer."

[dr. d]

Just read this: https://www.autoindustriya.com/auto-...da6-owner.html

"The Supreme Court (SC) has released a decision written by Associate Justice Marvic M. V. F. Leonen regarding the case of a 2011 Mazda6. On July 31, 2014, the owner of the vehicle, Alexander Caruncho, filed a complaint with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) against Mazda Quezon Avenue over a defect with the car; specifically the rack and pinion steering system.

The decision by the SC reaffirms a 2017 order by the Court of Appeals (CA) and a 2014 adjudication by the DTI that the consumer be given a refund. Mazda Quezon Avenue had elevated the matter to the SC over technicalities, but the court still ruled in favor of the consumer."

"we have a stable of lawyers under our regular payroll. we can afford to play the waiting game."

i hope the courts rule that it does not pay to play the waiting game.
hatawan ng hefty interest yung receivables ni complainant!

[uls]

so kung dealer ka bibili ka ng insurance against customers who will sue you

parang sa doctor meron sila insurance against patients who sue them for malpractice

A specialized type of professional liability insurance, medical malpractice insurance provides coverage to physicians and other medical professionals for liability arising from disputed services that result in a patient’s injury or death. A majority of American doctors face at least one medical malpractice lawsuit in the course of their career.

Carrying this type of insurance is essential for physicians—and is required by law in most states. Other medical professionals who should consider this type of coverage include dentists, psychologists, pharmacists, optometrists, nurses and physical therapists, among others.

dealers will include the cost of premiums sa price ng mga sasakyan na binebenta nila

hehe

[jresperanza]

Just read this: https://www.autoindustriya.com/auto-...da6-owner.html

"The Supreme Court (SC) has released a decision written by Associate Justice Marvic M. V. F. Leonen regarding the case of a 2011 Mazda6. On July 31, 2014, the owner of the vehicle, Alexander Caruncho, filed a complaint with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) against Mazda Quezon Avenue over a defect with the car; specifically the rack and pinion steering system.

The decision by the SC reaffirms a 2017 order by the Court of Appeals (CA) and a 2014 adjudication by the DTI that the consumer be given a refund. Mazda Quezon Avenue had elevated the matter to the SC over technicalities, but the court still ruled in favor of the consumer."

ayos, next nito ang innova group na out of the factory eh wala sa wheel alignment ang camber...