Results 11 to 20 of 23
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Posts
- 1,038
March 3rd, 2012 07:54 PM #11When cars was first conceptualized it was also mocked by great majority. Claiming that their horses and bandwagon are much better and cannot be replaced by this new mode of transportation......Fast Forward..100years and look where we are now.
That goes as well to the Wright brothers. Let's give it a try and see how it goes...it takes a single baby step to start moving.
And also though electricity came also majority from Fossil fuels, but still lbs per lbs it will be more economical to have electricity mode of transport compared to ICE internal combustion engines. Agree also the drawback will be the handling of battery waste..a Plan should also be in place in handling those.
-
March 3rd, 2012 08:27 PM #12
-
March 3rd, 2012 08:31 PM #13
-
March 3rd, 2012 08:43 PM #14
The problem with the electric car is clear. The current ideal battery (lithium ion) to be used cost too much. The affordable variant (lead acid) has too many short comings (heavy, low power density, short service life, environmentally toxic if not handled properly). We are already far beyond the early days of the motor car.
Also this is not a matter of R&D. It is a product & business study where everything should have been considered before things are set in motion. Unfortunately, the way things are being done, it would end up as a bunch of cobbled up half-thought fixes... something that should have been planned out from the start to ensure financial stability and efficiency of the project.
Thinking like yours has led us to our current predicament with short comings with the local clean air act.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Posts
- 1,038
March 3rd, 2012 08:56 PM #15Well, am just giving them a chance. At least though half baked merong small step and eventually when the prices of the Lithium batts are more affordable then that's the next phase. We need to be always positive though we really felt thats its half baked. I definitely agree to you guys..its some sort of quick patch job.
-
March 3rd, 2012 09:12 PM #16
Half-baked plans will result the project coming to a nothing in two years.
By the time lithium batteries would even become close to being affordable, the vehicles in the project would have been a pile of scrap of a while.
Example, the much promoted e-jeepney was started back in 2007. Today is 2012 and they are still making "improvements" that I had foreseen way back in 2007. Basic and practical things that should have been part of the design from day-one.
Also, what happened to the e-trike "tilapia" that was operating in the Fort back in 2007?
"e-trike driver in the Bonifacio Global City told us recently that a number of e-trikes had broken down."Last edited by ghosthunter; March 3rd, 2012 at 09:18 PM.
-
March 3rd, 2012 10:40 PM #17
Like I said, solar charging would be best but it is "kawanggawa" all the way.
The problem is the gov't keeps on insisting that this is a viable option. Papogi lang kasi sila, di naman sila gagastos. May nagbebenta dito sa amin ng mga e-vehicles na mura, kaso nagsara less than a year. Dito pa yan sa pro-environment "daw" na lugar ha.
Aanhin mo kasi magandang kuwento kung butas sikmura ng operator.Fasten your seatbelt! Or else...Driven To Thrill!
-
March 3rd, 2012 11:49 PM #18
pinilit ito eh
when you force something it usually doesnt turn out well
why not let market demand for EVs evolve by itself?
when there's demand there will be supply there will be infrastructure (charging stations, battery recyclers, whatever)
let evolution run its course
but noooo
environmentalists in govt keep pushing EVs
pansin niyo walang independent end user bumibili
it's all govt
it's driven by ideology. environmentalist ideologyLast edited by uls; March 3rd, 2012 at 11:58 PM.
-
March 4th, 2012 02:43 AM #19
-
March 4th, 2012 12:15 PM #20
this is what happens when you force something whose time has not yet come
electric cars are being pushed by environmentalists
the Obama admin (liberal, right-wing) pushed GM to make electric cars
it's ideology-driven
GM to Idle Volt Production for Five Weeks - WSJ.com
General Motors Co. will idle production of its Chevrolet Volt battery-powered car for five weeks beginning this month because of slow sales amid an effort to boost the vehicle's consumer appeal, the company said Friday.
Launched last year with great fanfare, the Volt has had a rocky start as sales stalled, and the car became a lightning rod for critics of the Obama administration's auto-industry bailout and support for alternative energy.
GM said around 1,300 workers at the Hamtramck, Mich., factory where the Volt is built will be out of work between March 19 and April 23, a spokesman said. The plant had just resumed production on Feb. 6 after a prolonged holiday shutdown.
let the demand happen by itselfLast edited by uls; March 4th, 2012 at 12:19 PM.
Agree with you there. Nicely put.
2022 Mazda BT-50 (3rd Gen)