Results 1 to 10 of 33
-
October 26th, 2016 09:54 AM #1
My tires are due for replacement and I'm looking for new tires that best suit my needs. I drive 30,000 km a year, most of which is expressway/provincial driving. I regularly drive spiritedly and enjoy twisty roads, but I try to drive gently as much as I can. I also attend 2-3 track days a year.
I currently have the Achilles 2233, which has lasted me 42,000 km including track use. I've had no complaints with its performance in daily driving and even the occasional mountain road. It doesn't do very well on the track though, and is a bit noisy on the highway. Am looking to upgrade to a more established brand that offers more grip and comfort without sacrificing durability too much.
After several days of research, I've narrowed my choices down to 3 tires:
1. GT Radial Champiro SX2
- P5,900 each
- 200 treadwear rating
- Extreme performance tire, suited for track use but can also double for daily driver duties
2. Kumho Ecsta LE Sport KU39
- P5,500 each
- 280 treadwear rating
- Ultra high performance tire, for more spirited driving compared to touring tires
3. Yokohama BluEarth-A AE50
- P5,500 each
- 320 treadwear rating
- Touring tire, designed for everyday driving with an emphasis on comfort and durability
The GT SX2 is renowned in racing circles as the best-value track day tire that you can still use on a daily basis. It has phenomenal grip compared to UHPs and touring tires, and would certainly improve lap times and make carving mountain roads easier. Unlike other extreme performance tires, the SX2 is affordable, has good grip in the wet, and is pretty durable. However, even as a long-wearing track tire, it still won't match the longevity of a good UHP or touring tire. They say it's good for about 25,000 km, which won't even last me a year. Also, as a track tire, it's pretty noisy for daily use. If I had a weekend car like a Miata, no doubt this would be my first choice, but for a daily driver like my Altis, I'm not sure if it's the ideal option.
The Yokohama BluEarth is on the other end of the spectrum - it's a touring tire designed for regular driving. It will definitely last me at least 40,000 km like my current set of tires, and it's quiet and comfortable as well. However, it's not exactly the most inspiring tire to use for spirited driving on twisty roads, much less the track. That said, I've survived with my low-end Achilles touring tires, so this is still somewhat of an upgrade. Another factor is that this is a Yokohama (though made in the PH). It's a low-end Japanese model going against high-end Korean and Indonesian tires.
The Kumho Ecsta lies somewhere in the middle of the SX2 and BluEarth. It's still good for daily driver duties and I'm confident I can get at least 30,000 km from it. It's definitely grippier than the Yokohama, but surely not as good as the SX2. For a UHP, it's pretty quiet too. It's certainly more suited for spirited driving, and I think it can hold its own for occasional track days as well.
Thoughts? [emoji5]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
October 26th, 2016 10:40 AM #2
Since the car will be primarily used a daily driver but with some spirited driving plus a few track days, the Kumho KU39 will be the best choice.
-
October 26th, 2016 12:11 PM #3
-
October 26th, 2016 12:20 PM #4
-
October 26th, 2016 03:05 PM #5
Great question bro. How much grip is really necessary? I reviewed my daily drives - EDSA traffic, NLEX cruising, overtaking on provincial roads, tackling corners at higher than usual speed. This kind of driving doesn't seem to necessitate the highest grip available - anything higher than normal is already a tangible improvement.
I've been leaning towards the KU39 but I was just wondering if there was any compelling reason to sway towards the track tire or touring tire.
Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk
-
October 26th, 2016 03:14 PM #6
Sometimes, thinking too much on coming up with a decision (analysis paralysis) can be stressful and counter-productive. A decision based off instinct or gut feeling can be rewarding.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Posts
- 1,054
October 26th, 2016 03:17 PM #7I'd choose the Kumhos as well. Another concern for me is tire carcass durability. Unfortunately only users with past experience with the tires can vouch for them here. Past GT's in general were prone to road hazard induced separations. The new generation GT's look a lot better though, specially in the tread area. The GT Savero SUVs we tested in their event were much grippier than the last gen Montero's OEM Yokohamas for example. We couldn't smoke them from standstill. But only actual use will tell if they hold up well against things like potholes.
-
October 26th, 2016 04:31 PM #8
What's the tire size?
I'm biased towards Yokos as they've proven to be very reliable for me. Have you even considered the A.Drive R1 AR01? The 205/55R16 costs a little over 4k at Lazada. Should be cheaper on the street.
-
October 26th, 2016 04:36 PM #9
-
October 26th, 2016 05:10 PM #10
I'm a very analytical person so I really do tend to overthink, especially for purchases. [emoji23]
Gave myself until tomorrow to buy, so I can end this madness. [emoji23]
The GT SX2 is their top-tier tire, often regarded as overbuilt, so I have no worries about its construction. However, being a track tire, it will naturally wear quicker and make more noise as it sticks to the road more.
AR01 is 7k each for 225/40R18. Hard to find though nowadays, as my friend who distributes Yokohamas couldn't find stocks for my size.
The R1 is also a pretty old tire, not to mention that it's marketed even by Yokohama as merely an entry-level performance tire. On the other hand, the Ecsta LE Sport KU39 is just one tier below the Ecsta XS KU36, which is Kumho's track tire already.
Reliability-wise, no doubt the BluEarth won't disappoint. But if I could get more grip for the same price without severely compromising noise and durability, I'd gladly take it.
Another thing that makes me interested with the KU39 is that it just costs 5.5k from GTD Banawe, while other sellers price it at 7k so I kinda feel like I'm getting a bargain.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkLast edited by jut703; October 26th, 2016 at 07:03 PM.
Yeah, they tried with the styling but one can still see that it is not very Mazda when compared to...
2022 Mazda BT-50 (3rd Gen)