New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 72 of 1213 FirstFirst ... 226268697071727374757682122172 ... LastLast
Results 711 to 720 of 12125
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,457
    #711
    Quote Originally Posted by yourman_2nd View Post
    wala pa ba tayo feedback from owners specially sa engine power or lack of it.
    The 2.5 vgs mux has as much grunt as the 2.5 vnt fortuner. The fortuner has a bit more but not by much. In the end we got the fortuner instead due to lack of supply.

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    276
    #712
    Naka testdrive ako 4x2 a/t mu x last week.
    Mu x is Slower than 4x2 a/t fort. I forgot to turn off ESC, so i dont know if would make any difference.
    Shifting is smooth or is it because it wont rev hard.
    Dont like the 70-80kph behavior ng fortuner maybe because 4 speed lang pero i ordered one also.
    Mu x Suspension or ride is better.

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #713
    Quote Originally Posted by Djerms View Post
    The 2.5 vgs mux has as much grunt as the 2.5 vnt fortuner. The fortuner has a bit more but not by much. In the end we got the fortuner instead due to lack of supply.
    Nag-Fort ka na pala? Sayang...

    I'm liking the MU-X so far... The space is incredible! tTe ride is a bit jiggly, but that's because I've got the tires inflated over the door sticker... still have to check what it's like at the recommended 29 psi. Power is pretty darn good. 136 hp is more than enough for a car like this. It's only on the highway at over 100 where it starts feeling a bit wheezy... but I don't miss the 3.0 one bit.

    And, looking at the engine bay... even if it can't achieve the same flood fording height as the Ranger or Trailblazer, I think it will come close.

    Too bad the supply is so constrained... I can imagine trading in the Crosswind for one of these.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  4. Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    329
    #714
    mga sir sa mga naka pag test drive na po ng 2.5 MUX(at/mt), is it the same or comparable po ba cia sa 2.5 tdci ng ford everest?

  5. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    479
    #715
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    Nag-Fort ka na pala? Sayang...

    I'm liking the MU-X so far... The space is incredible! tTe ride is a bit jiggly, but that's because I've got the tires inflated over the door sticker... still have to check what it's like at the recommended 29 psi. Power is pretty darn good. 136 hp is more than enough for a car like this. It's only on the highway at over 100 where it starts feeling a bit wheezy... but I don't miss the 3.0 one bit.

    And, looking at the engine bay... even if it can't achieve the same flood fording height as the Ranger or Trailblazer, I think it will come close.

    Too bad the supply is so constrained... I can imagine trading in the Crosswind for one of these.
    sir, when will your test drive results come out in TG para mas comprehensive? so looking forward to reading your review at TG.

  6. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #716
    The older Ford 2.5 feels peppier... but not by much. The Isuzu 2.5 feels stronger than the Mitsubishi non-VGT 2.5.

    Quote Originally Posted by yourman_2nd View Post
    sir, when will your test drive results come out in TG para mas comprehensive? so looking forward to reading your review at TG.
    We finish the drive this week. Should have something up by next week.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  7. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    479
    #717
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    The older Ford 2.5 feels peppier... but not by much. The Isuzu 2.5 feels stronger than the Mitsubishi non-VGT 2.5.



    We finish the drive this week. Should have something up by next week.
    sir tama ba yung observation ko na tahimik yung engine or just the improved noise deadening? kasi when i test drove it (for a short time during the PIMS), quite noticeable yung quiet engine compared tothe R-eVGT of my santa fe. ofcourse there's no comparison as regards to power. also, the suspension was, IMO, better as in bouncier or softer than my ride

  8. Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,408
    #718
    Hi guys! I've been following this thread even before we got our unit last Saturday. Coming from an old Hi-Lander, the engine is really silent for an Isuzu. 80% siguro maririnig mo lang road noise. We're really impressed and it doesn't feel underpowered at all.

  9. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,557
    #719
    *Niky: I can't wait to read your review on TGP, sir.


    *Djerms: Nag Fortuner na father mo, sir? Sayang! Baka pag nabasa mo ang review ni sir Niky next week ay manghinayang kayo.hehe


    *LancerA174A: Welcome to Tsikot, sir! It is really a world of difference if you compare the engine of Hilander to the MU-X. It is way more refined, less vibration and noise and accelerates way quickier than the engine of yesteryears.

    Iakyat mo sa matatarik na lugar, sir, then I-share mo dito para malaman ang capability ng MU-x sa steep climbs especially if it is fully loaded.

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #720
    Department of Energy eco drive: 19Km/liter

    link below:


    Isuzu takes new, much better direction with mu-X | Motioncars

Tags for this Thread

All New Isuzu MU-X // Alterra Next Generation