Results 1 to 10 of 26
Hybrid View
-
February 23rd, 2006 08:27 AM #1
Originally Posted by The Wall Street Journal Asia
-
February 23rd, 2006 08:28 AM #2
USDM Hybrid Fit which will sell for only $12,000 and gets a whopping 80mpg
-
February 27th, 2006 01:49 PM #3
Originally Posted by Karding
wow...tapos magbababaan na presyo ng gas.
-
-
February 23rd, 2006 09:38 AM #5
Wow, so around 34km/liter ito? Oks, so around Php1/km lang gas cost nito.
-
-
February 23rd, 2006 12:40 PM #7
Edi ayos, once every 2 months ka nalang magpapafulltank hahaha, maka mas mataas pa oil change cost mo kesa fuel cost.
-
February 23rd, 2006 12:49 PM #8
that 80mpg figure is US EPA highway reading, which is at a constant 48mph with no aircon. :P
about 60mpg would be the realistic highway mileage, and Phil. city driving conditions about 40mpg.
so that's 25km/L highway and 17km/L city. both figures of which are readily achievable under realistic conditions by the Hyundai Matrix.
i'm on the alt.autos.toyota newsgroup, and the americans on the group can't figure out why anyone would pay big bucks for a Prius which gets 40-something mpg when a Tercel with a gas engine gets 35-something. Same case here, a difference of 200,000 yen is about $2000. would you buy a Honda Jazz for 900k to get the hybrid technology? potential shocker pa yan pag lumusong ka sa baha.
-
February 24th, 2006 02:33 AM #9
Originally Posted by orly_andico
pero Im pretty sure my ground fault detection or else it would have never been approved by the NHTSA.
hindi ko din maintindihan kung bakit hindi ini-isip ng mga Hybrid buyers ang long term expenses or the big picture. A price difference of $5,000 for Prius is so ridiculous when you have to wait 8 years to recover the extra money spent compared to driving a Corolla.
the estimated MPG of each car is a ballpark figure indeed, could be a good or bad. For example, my 04 Civic was rated 37mpg highway. I drove from LA to San Diego with A/C on * cruising speed of 70mph, and the MPG I got? 42mpg ;) And it wasnt stock Civic, intake, header, exhaust, heavy 17's which could have made the fuel economy worst.
The Prius is a different story. Kaya hindi cost effective ang Prius compared to similar car like Corolla, dahil na din sa $5,000 difference nila. Whereas with Fit/Jazz, $1,700 lang ang difference compared to gas powered Fit/Jazz.
Another way to get the ROI quickly is if you drive more than the average of 12,000 miles. If you drive 12,000 a year then a gas powered is better for ROI.
30,000 miles a year = 1.5year to recover the price difference with annual savings of $1,071
12,000 miles a year = 3.9years to recover the price difference with annual savings of $428
OR...the price of gas reaches $5.00/gal
Monthly payment:
Hybrid Jazz/Fit = $228/mo x 60months
Gas Jazz/Fit = $200/mo x 60months
$5000 battery, save the $1000 yearly and by the 5th year, may pambili ka na hahahaa
its a good tool to decide if Hybrid is for you or not. depending on one's own assumption of the REAL mpg, the ROI could be quicker or slower.
If you are a road warrior, then Hybrid Jazz/Fit is probably a better way to commute.
-
February 24th, 2006 02:32 PM #10
Originally Posted by Karding
Since Honda is known for their "quick launch" IMA motor for the Accord, will the hybrid system give the Jazz/Fit a peppier launch, too? If it turns the 9-10 second 1.5 CVT into an 8 second car, it would likely be worth the extra 100,000 pesos over the regular 1.5, hybrid or not.
I've always thought the way Honda went with the Accord Hybrid was the way to go. Show people you're not sacrificing anything to fuel efficiency... that you can get both high performance and low fuel consumption in the same package, in a car that's not any different than the regular one.
Not like the Prius or Insight, where you sacrifice performance, practicality and comfort to the gods of the gas pump.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
The 12-month warranty on the factory battery ended a few days ago. SOH is still good at over 90%,...
Cheaper brands than Motolite but reliable as well