New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 59 of 122 FirstFirst ... 94955565758596061626369109 ... LastLast
Results 581 to 590 of 1220
  1. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    224
    #581
    To Owners of 2007 CRV, post your fuel consumption here in km/L.

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    75
    #582
    quote=rudyphoto;791495]To Owners of 2007 CRV, post your fuel consumption here in km/L.[/quote]


    fuel gauge meter average km per liter: 11.8 km/L but had to make a stop while engine running.....it went down to 10.3 km/L

    distance: 302 kms

    average speed: 80-120 km/hr...occasional 130's

    dont know kung malakas yung consumption cause i am used to my 04 City 1.3 consumption at around 14-16kms/L

  3. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    75
    #583
    Quote Originally Posted by rudyphoto View Post
    To Owners of 2007 CRV, post your fuel consumption here in km/L.
    Average fuel consumption based on the on board meter: 11.8 km/L but had to make a 20mins stop while engine running....meter went down to 10.3km/L

    Distance traveled was 302 km/L.

    Dont know if malakas yung V sa gas, as i am used to driving a 2004 1.3CVT City which averages from 14-16km/L.

    2.4 yung gamit ko pala, average speed was between 80-120kms/hr with occasional 130's.

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,837
    #584
    I would assume na non-city FC yan kasi average speed is 80-120km. medyo malakas sa gas kung hanggang 11.8km/liter lang sya with such a small body. is your unit 4wd?

    our former V6 3.0 Chevy venture LWB AT averages 10-11km/liter sa computer meter kapag non-city. but drops to 3-4km/liter normal city driving.

  5. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    224
    #585
    Quote Originally Posted by oldblue View Post
    I would assume na non-city FC yan kasi average speed is 80-120km. medyo malakas sa gas kung hanggang 11.8km/liter lang sya with such a small body. is your unit 4wd?

    our former V6 3.0 Chevy venture LWB AT averages 10-11km/liter sa computer meter kapag non-city. but drops to 3-4km/liter normal city driving.
    That's a reading of a 2.4L 4x4 new CRV sir.

  6. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    224
    #586
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeye View Post
    Average fuel consumption based on the on board meter: 11.8 km/L but had to make a 20mins stop while engine running....meter went down to 10.3km/L

    Distance traveled was 302 km/L.

    Dont know if malakas yung V sa gas, as i am used to driving a 2004 1.3CVT City which averages from 14-16km/L.

    2.4 yung gamit ko pala, average speed was between 80-120kms/hr with occasional 130's.
    Good for a 2.4L new CRV MR. mikeye, mine ive got a 9.0 to 9.4 km/L driving (35 to 70 kms range) City driving at the province. Mine is a 2.0L new CRV manual tranny.
    Last edited by rudyphoto; April 13th, 2007 at 08:24 AM. Reason: transmission

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6
    #587
    hi guys. i'm a little confused which i will get 2.4 or 2.0 which do you guys think would have better gas consumption? my logic tells me that if the vehicle is under powered it tends to eat more gas. you need more pulling power if your body is larger which is the case on 3rd crv vs. 1st crv.

    another perspective i'm looking at is 2.0 would be more fuel efficient in traffic situations, smaller engine lesser consumption at idling?

    what do you guys think? which would be more fuel efficient? 2.0 or 2.4?

  8. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    39
    #588
    2.4
    city 5km/l
    highway 10.5km/l
    fastest 150km/h

  9. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    114
    #589
    Quote Originally Posted by denso View Post
    hi guys. i'm a little confused which i will get 2.4 or 2.0 which do you guys think would have better gas consumption? my logic tells me that if the vehicle is under powered it tends to eat more gas. you need more pulling power if your body is larger which is the case on 3rd crv vs. 1st crv.

    another perspective i'm looking at is 2.0 would be more fuel efficient in traffic situations, smaller engine lesser consumption at idling?

    what do you guys think? which would be more fuel efficient? 2.0 or 2.4?
    Its all about power-to-weight ratios.

    I've got a gen-2 CRV (2-litre, 95 RON) and a gen-7 Civic (2-litre, 93 RON). Same engines, automatics, and using the mfr recommended fuel octane for the respective cars, it would appear that the lighter car (Civic) is more powerful and fuel efficient.

    Going over to the new CRV, here are the numbers:

    6M/T
    2.0 (2WD): 150-hp/1.475-tons = 101.70-hp/ton

    5A/T
    2.0 (2WD): 150-hp/1.505-tons = 99.7-hp/ton
    2.4 (4WD): 170-hp/1.600-tons = 106.3-hp/ton

    I would therefore lean towards the 2.4-litre model. But that's just me.

  10. Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    310
    #590
    anybody know where i can get a quick unit? yung tipong ndi ka na pipila, hehe, yun pinakamalapit na honda dito march pa ko nag order wala parin unit ko...

2007 Honda CR-V [Merged]