New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34
  1. Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,542
    #11
    have also seen new Toyota Hi-Ace Grandia kaninang umaga papuntang Antipolo....n*mp#ts*, ang sakay mga bata with their yayas as if my family outing....Tayo na sa Antipolo.....

    hanep naman....tsk tsk tsk! Buti pa sila!

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    1,306
    #12
    I have seen a few CR-Vs and Fortuners na naka-red plate din.

  3. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    323
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by slicker_boi
    Nakita ko ito sa Quezon Ave malapit sa Banawe. Sayang hindi ko nakuha yung exact plate number, pero pinost ko ito para lang iparating ang maaaring kurakot na naman sa mga binabayad nating mamamayan.

    Kaya na bang makabili ng ganito with 10, 15K sweldo? Di ba dapat hanggang AUV lang ang red platers? Sobra yatang abusado sa tingin ko!
    Red plate so goverment-owned vehicle at tayo and nagbabayad niyan. Hindi kasali ang sweldo dyan.

    Tama si 111prez, baka wrong priority ng goverment agency.
    Last edited by herbularyo; March 20th, 2006 at 01:53 PM.

  4. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,063
    #14
    Kurakot Amp

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    14,822
    #15
    IMO...

    we are always too fast to judge people without even getting their side of the story.

    what if the said vehicle belongs to an agency that is an income generating agency (like BSP, GSIS, SSS, PAGCOR, etc.)? doesn't top government employees deserve some form of privelege also? in the private sector, we expect a car plan at least for a managerial position. in the government, the privilege to use of vehicle starts only at the director position. if the government at least doesn't match the going rate in the industry then they'll lose some of their best people working for them.

    though there are still some bad eggs out there but refrain from generalizing all government officials as such.

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,603
    #16
    Oo nga naman. even people in government need perks too. Di naman porque gobyerno e cheapo beater lang dapat ang auto.

  7. Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    29
    #17
    tama ,,hinda naman dapat lahatin diba!!!

  8. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,726
    #18
    There should be a value limit when it comes to government cars. If a certain government employee wants a more expensive vehicle, he should just buy his own. The red platers are supposed to be service vehicles only - entailing no vanity whatsoever.

    It's better to keep things uniform, regardless whether or not a certain department is income-generating. It's bad enough we don't get to know where our taxes go in the first place.

  9. Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    296
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by mazdamazda
    IMO...

    we are always too fast to judge people without even getting their side of the story.

    what if the said vehicle belongs to an agency that is an income generating agency (like BSP, GSIS, SSS, PAGCOR, etc.)? doesn't top government employees deserve some form of privelege also? in the private sector, we expect a car plan at least for a managerial position. in the government, the privilege to use of vehicle starts only at the director position. if the government at least doesn't match the going rate in the industry then they'll lose some of their best people working for them.

    though there are still some bad eggs out there but refrain from generalizing all government officials as such.
    Kung sa maid uniform nga lang, andami nang naisip ng mga tao e, sa sasakyan pa kaya?

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,362
    #20
    Hold on guys. Red plates are supposedly "for official use only", which means you can't take it to the mall on a weekend. I think car-as-a-benefit for employees should be green plated.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Maroon X-Trail with Red Plates