ALERT: Goons with Guns - Isuzu Trooper "MLP-636"

**moejun2** · February 1st, 2010 12:12 AM

what's with the use of "totoy" clavel? sounds a bit condescending to me.

**fireblade** · February 1st, 2010 09:53 AM

Originally Posted by CLAVEL3699

please read the red txt. yun answer ko

Originally Posted by MrGunn

The PNP may file a case against the gun toter. He is, after all, in violation of the enforced gun ban. The pics are enough evidence to support gun ban violation which would result in old guy's license revocation to own firearms as well as possibly jail time.

If the complainant files a case, it will be mild threats, since the perp did not point the gun at him. If the gun was directly pointed at the cameraman, then it is grave threats, NOT frustrated murder.

These are the only things the complainant can file against the perp, even if the case seems to have blown out in a huge way due to the internet.

Hope this clarifies the issue a bit.

I beg to disagree. The PNP can not file a complaint due to the gun ban. The picture itself is not evidence that it was taken during the gun ban. Just like the case of the AMA executive (broadcasted on national TV), the complaint was not filed as the aggrieved party did not pursue. In this case, if the picture taker will not file the necessary case, then the PNP can not pursue.

**AnK** · February 1st, 2010 10:25 AM

Originally Posted by MrGunn

The PNP may file a case against the gun toter. He is, after all, in violation of the enforced gun ban. The pics are enough evidence to support gun ban violation which would result in old guy's license revocation to own firearms as well as possibly jail time.

I think this incident happened before the gun ban.

**meledson** · February 1st, 2010 10:38 AM

I hope that this will inform gun owners to be more responsible.

**CLAVEL3699** · February 1st, 2010 10:55 AM

Originally Posted by moejun2

what's with the use of "totoy" clavel? sounds a bit condescending to me.

syo oo. sa min dalawa hindi.

he called me paps and called him totoy...

were good.

**moejun2** · February 1st, 2010 10:58 AM

^ yes, that's why i said "to me" but i guess you didn't get that.

**CLAVEL3699** · February 1st, 2010 11:08 AM

Originally Posted by moejun2

^ yes, that's why i said "to me" but i guess you didn't get that.

thats why I said also " syo oo". u didn't get that.

OT back to the topic.

**moejun2** · February 1st, 2010 11:37 AM

cool, i guess you really are that way.

back to the topic.

**lazyfoot** · February 1st, 2010 11:37 AM

Anyway just to share the talk between me and my boss (our VP) during lunch last week

Boss: you know the report of the guy who got his picture taken with a gun in his car, he's all over the news now
Me: yeah! the guy who took that pic must have balls of steel to do that.
Boss: yeah, he's my cousin
Me: wow, how did he do that. it's amazing he was still able to take the picture.
Boss: No, my cousin was the one holding the gun...
[Long ackward silence]
Me: ah ok
[Continue eating lunch]

**praetor91313** · February 1st, 2010 11:46 AM

Originally Posted by CLAVEL3699

pagnaglabas ka nang baril at parang itinututok mo. pwede ka kasuhan nang frustrated murder... tama ba ako guys?

pagnakabaril ka murder naman yun? kaya sumatotal, kulong ka pa din kaya iputok mo na lang... sabi nga ni eddie garcia kung bubunutin mo yan siguraduhin mo lang na kaya mo iputok dahil parehas lang yan ( at walang buhay na tistego, sabi nga nang kakilala ko na hired killer )

As I understand it, just showing your gun without implying bodily harm (pag nilagbas mo baril mo tapos minura mo ng "PI mo" pero di mo tinutok) constitutes "Light threats" and a penalty of aresto menor or a fine of not more than P200.

Pag tinutok mo naman o kahit di mo tinutok pero you implied bodily harm such as shouting, "Ipuputok ko to sa mukha mo!", that's "Grave Threats" and a penalty of aresto mayor plus a fine not exceeding P500 are given.

Pag may injury naman nangyari and the perpetrator can be proven to have an intent ko kill, yun ang frustrated murder.