Results 1 to 10 of 32
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Posts
- 9,720
May 6th, 2004 10:52 AM #1is one really better than the other? what benefit does having two camshafts working the intake/exhaust valves have?
-
May 6th, 2004 11:10 AM #2
ok, basically DOHC is a lot powerful than SOHC counterpart. this is due to the fact that DOHC has separate camshaft for both intake and exhaust valves. because there is less slippage for the camshaft on DOHC, especially at high RPMs, thus, no power loss.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Posts
- 9,720
May 6th, 2004 11:16 AM #3ic...napansin ko lang kasi ung mga ford suvs e usually SOHC lang. is it because the larger displacement more than makes up for the slippage?
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Posts
- 12
-
May 6th, 2004 11:39 AM #5
my opinion on this is DOHC engines produce abundant power and torque while returning a not so satisfying fuel mileage...while SOHC engines return a good fuel mileage while producing marginal power and torque ( given that they have both the same displacements)
-
May 6th, 2004 11:44 AM #6
the big advantage of sohc is that it costs less for an automaker to produce.
-
May 6th, 2004 11:53 AM #7
yep. production cost, is considered. SOHC is fairly easy to manufacture and less complicated than DOHC
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 129
May 6th, 2004 03:27 PM #8Both DOHC and SOHC should be the same, all things being equal (same # of valves, same valve actuation, displacement, etc.).
Theoretically, DOHC's should have an inertial disadvantage by reason of the greater moment of inertia resulting from 2 instead of one camshaft/gear. But the difference is very slight because the crankshaft has a 2:1 mechanical advantage over the camshaft. However, since combustion is so much better with a centrally located spark plug (consider Dodge/Chrysler's "Hemi" design), a DOHC will usually be used for engines designed more for Horsepower than Torque. Another reason is with DOHC, there no longer is a need for tappets as the valves are directly acted upon by the cams. Less moving parts, less inertia and inertial loads, the higher the rpm capacity of the engine, the greater the power output. Thus, more powerful engines are usually found with DOHC rather than SOHC, but that's not to say a DOHC setup is more superior to the SOHC design.
There's more to an engine's power characteristics than the valve train, though that may be a crucial part.Last edited by ebbfolls; May 6th, 2004 at 03:41 PM.
-
May 6th, 2004 09:18 PM #9mas malakas dohc
Meron pa ngang OHV nabasa ko dati ito sa car magazine..Ford pa nga yun eh..:D
-
May 6th, 2004 09:58 PM #10Originally posted by ebbfolls
Both DOHC and SOHC should be the same, all things being equal (same # of valves, same valve actuation, displacement, etc.).
Theoretically, DOHC's should have an inertial disadvantage by reason of the greater moment of inertia resulting from 2 instead of one camshaft/gear. But the difference is very slight because the crankshaft has a 2:1 mechanical advantage over the camshaft. However, since combustion is so much better with a centrally located spark plug (consider Dodge/Chrysler's "Hemi" design), a DOHC will usually be used for engines designed more for Horsepower than Torque. Another reason is with DOHC, there no longer is a need for tappets as the valves are directly acted upon by the cams. Less moving parts, less inertia and inertial loads, the higher the rpm capacity of the engine, the greater the power output. Thus, more powerful engines are usually found with DOHC rather than SOHC, but that's not to say a DOHC setup is more superior to the SOHC design.
There's more to an engine's power characteristics than the valve train, though that may be a crucial part.
in practical terms, DOHC is superior to SOHC because it's easier to design and package a 4 or 5 valve-per-cylinder setup with an intake and an exhaust cam than a single cam doing double duty. this is why people tend to think DOHC > SOHC...because most DOHC engines are 4v/cylinder and SOHC are 2v/cylinder. the advantage really comes from 4v/cyl > 2v/cyl, not the camshaft design.
it's also more practical to have a DOHC engine if you want to do variable valve timing (VVT-i, VTEC, Vanos) because you can dynamically and independently adjust intake and exhaust timing with two cams. so chalk that up as another advantage of DOHC.
I would also do some research into the final-design-function performance of carbon fiber hoods...
Carbon fiber hood