Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 1
June 28th, 2012 09:59 PM #1Hi,
Newbie here. Me gusto sana akong itanong sa mga experts dito...
Planning to buy new car and I need your expert advice. In terms of fuel consumption, space and durability, which is better? This will be used mostly for City driving. If it's going to be loaded with 5 adults, which would perform better?
Any advice is highly appreciated. Thanks!
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 4,447
June 28th, 2012 10:28 PM #2why not consider vios or city? since you need fuel efficient and durable. you can really depend on it. hyundai and kia? not so much
thats my opinion
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 106
June 28th, 2012 10:35 PM #3
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 1,668
June 28th, 2012 10:48 PM #4They are essentially the same cars, different lng yun body.
Same engine, same lahat.
Same FC
Same Space
If loaded w/ 5 adults, masikip yun dalawa.
Just test drive both cars, see what fits your bill.
Although I've noticed, Kia has better fit and finish. But its your call.
For durability, Kia offers 5 years warranty or 160k kms. More than other car makers. So, baka mas ok Kia?
Vios, common na pangtaxi
City, mahal sobra, bare bones naman ang specs
-
June 28th, 2012 11:29 PM #5
Both Kia and Hyundai offer 5-year warranties.
Between the two, I'd get the Rio. Why?
- Better suspension. The Accent has a soft rear suspension that easily bottoms out over humps. Also, in general, Kia suspensions are tuned to have firmer and sportier rides than their Hyundai counterparts.
- Rarer. While both are pretty cars, the fewer number of Rios on the road make it more of a looker than the Accent.
- Less vehicle/dealer complaints. Fewer Rio owners have complained about knocking issues on their Rios, and complaints about Kia dealers aren't as rampant as those about Hyundai. However, this may simply be a result of the fact that there are fewer Rio owners in the first place.
Other things to consider:
- For the Accent, the 1.4 GL MT has less features than the 1.4 GL AT.
- For the Rio, the 1.4 EX MT has exactly the same features as the 1.4 EX AT.
- The 1.4 EX AT Rio and 1.4 GL AT Accent have practically the same features and specs.
- Since both cars have the same 1.4L Gamma engine, they are susceptible to the knocking issue that several Accent owners experienced. However, this isn't really a widespread case (more of just a few guys who've made the issue bigger than it seems), and in case you do get afflicted by it, you can have your ECU reprogrammed.
Now, comparing the Hyundai/Kia twins to other subcompacts:
- The 1.4L engine on both cars isn't as efficient as the 1.3 engines from Toyota, Mazda or Honda. In fact, fuel consumption is actually closer to the 1.5/1.6L engines of the Jazz/City, Fiesta and Mazda 2. The most fuel efficient 1.3L subcompacts are the Vios and Mazda 2. The most fuel efficient 1.5L subcompacts are the Vios and Yaris.
- The Kia/Hyundai twins are the most spacious subcompacts in terms of interior room.
- Features of the EX/GL models are comparable to the Vios 1.3G (740k), City 1.3S (786k), Jazz 1.3S (792k), and Fiesta 1.4 Trend (739k).
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 1,442
June 29th, 2012 12:33 PM #6accent bec it looks expensive lapit sa Benz likod eh. Sedan rio looks like a masa car tulad ng sedan fiesta, mz2.
-
June 29th, 2012 12:46 PM #7
kung sa porma mas gusto ko un RIO pero sa specs mas gusto ko yun ACCCENT hehehe
yun Vios kasi pang taxi...kung my budget try mo kaya yun honda jazz
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 4,726
June 29th, 2012 05:14 PM #8Rio na... wala yan vios ang liit nyan...
Btw, meron na mga rio sedans na ginagawang taxi....
Is it just me or have traffic worsened this week compared to pre-Holy Week? Is it because people...
Traffic!