Results 11 to 20 of 34
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 414
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Posts
- 66
-
February 22nd, 2015 02:28 PM #13
Civic for me. Much better in all aspects (ie., looks, comfort,etc.)
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Posts
- 143
-
March 23rd, 2015 10:30 AM #15
It's a no brainer unless you're so mindful of fuel expense. The Civic FD 1.8L is more comfortable, rides and handles better, and with just a kilometer or two per liter difference in FC over the 1.5L City.
Let's say, we translate it to Toyota vehicles. Will you choose the previous gen Vios or the previous gen Altis?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It's a no brainer unless you're so mindful of fuel expense. The Civic FD 1.8L is more comfortable, rides and handles better, and with just a kilometer or two per liter difference in FC over the 1.5L City.
Let's say, we translate it to Toyota vehicles. Will you choose the previous gen Vios or the previous gen Altis?
-
March 23rd, 2015 11:26 AM #16
Owned a city 05 before with paddle shifter and it's fun to drive but my '10 civic 1.8S have much more to offer in most aspects.
The only downside of the civic against its little sister i guess is its stiffer ride. Maintenance wise the civic is a tad higher given she's bigger (more oil, bigger tires, etc)
-
March 24th, 2015 02:45 PM #17
Civic FD is a joy to drive. I'm actually waiting for the 2010 refresh (one with square LED tail lights) to cheapen so I can get one, perhaps a manual. The power is there, the steering is precise. It's more economical if you drive long distances (like most "big engined" cars. 1.8 isn't particularly big but if you compare it to subcompacts with 1.0cc, it is.
City, a subcompact, is a nice city dweller. On long roads, it runs out of breath after 110kmh. It takes so long to speed up after that. Nothing happens until after 4000rpm where it starts moving. Torque comes in much later. Electronics are medieval. I'm used to automated cars that shuts everything off when you press lock. I happen to leave a 5 day old City's headlights on and 30mins later after a quick lunch, it won't start. The darn thing doesn't automatically manage electrical power. I was shocked to learn that the battery is a motorcycle spec size. It's literally just for starting the car. LOL. You get what you pay for I guess. Honda might have fixed this issue with the new City but I haven't tried the new one yet. Still, better than a friend's latest Ford fiesta which keeps going back to the repair shop because of transmission issues.
Both cars are ok. But if I were to get either, it's definitely the Civic.Last edited by Horsepower; March 24th, 2015 at 02:49 PM.
-
Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Posts
- 1
April 18th, 2015 08:08 PM #18Have the same dillema the only difference is mine are brand new, still now havent decided if ill go for city vx modulo or civic e
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 414
April 19th, 2015 09:07 AM #19
-
April 19th, 2015 10:38 PM #20
If you just want a daily people hauler with lots of gadgets, the City VX will be fine. The new City VX is almost the same in interior space as some compacts. However, it cannot compare to the power and handling of the Civic FB (despite losing its sportiness over the previous Civic FD). The Civic FB is light for its size (lighter than most compacts) thus offering better power-to-weight ratio.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If you just want a daily people hauler with lots of gadgets, the City VX will be fine. The new City VX is almost the same in interior space as some compacts. However, it cannot compare to the power and handling of the Civic FB (despite losing its sportiness over the previous Civic FD). The Civic FB is light for its size (lighter than most compacts) thus offering better power-to-weight ratio.
Agree with you there. Nicely put.
2022 Mazda BT-50 (3rd Gen)