2016 Toyota Fortuner V 4x4 2.8L vs 2016 Isuzu MU-X LS-A 4x4 3.0L

**PATSYS** · July 7th, 2016 08:15 AM

Hi guys,

I am now looking for a new SUV and it boils down to either Fortuner or MU-X.

I am aware that the Fortuner is more expensive but aside from the price, what are the advantages/disadvantages of one over the other?

Thanks

**ice15** · July 7th, 2016 11:45 AM

This should help...

http://www.topgear.com.ph/features/f...20160520-lfrm3

**vinj** · July 7th, 2016 12:28 PM

Engine response, NVH levels and brake feel favors the Fortuner based on my brief drives of both vehicles. The MUX is hard to discount based on pricing though.

**Walter** · July 7th, 2016 05:33 PM

^^^ Always remember, most of the time, you get what you pay for ...

**Sleepcare** · July 7th, 2016 05:47 PM

Originally Posted by vinj

Engine response, NVH levels and brake feel favors the Fortuner based on my brief drives of both vehicles. The MUX is hard to discount based on pricing though.

+1 for the comment above.

Much more premium-looking than the MU-X.

On the other note, I feel that the MU-X is more spacious than the Fortuner for both legroom and headroom. Also, I must say that I really love the low-down torque of the 4JJ1 motor.

Personally, you won't go wrong with either. Truly, you'll get what you pay for.

**Janemar** · July 7th, 2016 05:54 PM

Originally Posted by Sleepcare

+1 for the comment above.

Much more premium-looking than the MU-X.

On the other note, I feel that the MU-X is more spacious than the Fortuner for both legroom and headroom. Also, I must say that I really love the low-down torque of the 4JJ1 motor.

Personally, you won't go wrong with either. Truly, you'll get what you pay for.

If "for keeps" auto, go with MuX.

If you'll sell it 5-10years from now, fortuner.

If features, fortuner. Space/headroom/leg room is not a factor if you dont have a family member who is higher than 5'10" in height.

**PATSYS** · July 8th, 2016 07:07 PM

Originally Posted by Sleepcare

+1 for the comment above.

Much more premium-looking than the MU-X.

On the other note, I feel that the MU-X is more spacious than the Fortuner for both legroom and headroom. Also, I must say that I really love the low-down torque of the 4JJ1 motor.

Personally, you won't go wrong with either. Truly, you'll get what you pay for.

Not sure I understand this part:

"I really love the low-down torque of the 4JJ1 motor"

Care to elaborate this part? Thanks

**PATSYS** · July 8th, 2016 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by Janemar

If "for keeps" auto, go with MuX.

If you'll sell it 5-10years from now, fortuner.

If features, fortuner. Space/headroom/leg room is not a factor if you dont have a family member who is higher than 5'10" in height.

Hi,

Why do you think the MU-x more "for keeps" than the Fortuner?

Timing chain na rin yata ang Fortuner...

**PATSYS** · July 9th, 2016 08:46 AM

Originally Posted by ice15

This should help...

http://www.topgear.com.ph/features/f...20160520-lfrm3

Thanks Man, that article was good input.

**crosswind** · July 9th, 2016 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by PATSYS

Hi,

Why do you think the MU-x more "for keeps" than the Fortuner?

Timing chain na rin yata ang Fortuner...

The Fortuner uses timing belt for a quieter engine where in you have to replace on it's 150k kms.
The Mu-x PMS is cheaper than the Fortuner. I was shocked when I brought my MU-X 3.0 for it's 1k PMS it is way cheaper than my Trooper with a 4jx1 engine. The build quality of the interior of the Mux looks cheap with hard plastics everywhere