Results 31 to 40 of 41
-
April 20th, 2012 07:44 AM #31
Price of the new CRV will come out on Monday according to Honda Philippines. Sabay na sabay sila ng MAZDA. A lot of the extra specs are available only on the 2.4 model. Pero standard ang back up camera for all.
-
April 29th, 2012 01:19 PM #32
This thread has been quiet.
Now that both have been launched, any feedback from everyone?
I'm getting my white CX-5 next week and although I love my 2006 petrol-hungry 2nd Gen CRV, I think it's time to try a new brand.
Initial feedback is the slightly high SRPs for both. Both are imported from Japan and may lack a few trims expected at the price range. I was disappointed by the lack of leather seats, back-up camera and bigger wheels for the CX-5.
Why I chose the CX-5? Maybe it's mid-life crisis.I'm now 41 and the CRV reminds me that I'm dad. The CX-5 makes me feel 10-15 years younger! Hehe!
Zoom zoom!
-
April 29th, 2012 01:53 PM #33
-
April 29th, 2012 01:59 PM #34
Family friendly Honda CR-V vs. fun-to-drive Mazda CX-5
Apr 26, 2012 1:30 PM
The redesigned Honda CR-V and new Mazda CX-5 appear to have a lot in common. These small SUVs seat five passengers, are of similar size, and cost about the same. So far so good. But when we dig deeper, two distinct personalities emerge.
The CR-V is more of a family-oriented model than the Mazda. Our $26,455 EX trim has a large, easy-to-access back seat, plenty of cargo room, and a standard backup camera. Hondas have a well-deserved reputation for smooth, fuel-efficient powertrains, and the new CR-V delivers. We measured 23 mpg overall, making it competitive among small SUVs. Plus, with 185 horsepower, it's no slouch off the line. And if a comfortable ride is high on your priority list, the CR-V is among the best small SUV choices.
On the other hand, if you're looking for a fun-to-drive small SUV, the CX-5 has it all over the CR-V. We found the Mazda athletic and engaging, with responsive steering and well-contained body lean that remains unfazed in bumpy corners. And even with a high fun factor, the CX-5 also delivers the best fuel economy in its class - 25 mpg overall -thanks to Mazda's new Skyactiv technology. And despite the sporty demeanor, the rear seat is surprisingly roomy. One surprise: our midlevel Touring trim line also included a blind-spot monitoring system, a feature not usually found in a $27,000 vehicle.
But as good as the CR-V and CX-5 are, the Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester still outscore them. How, you may ask? The Mazda is hurt by a noisy cabin, a taut ride on the highway, and an underpowered feeling engine during routine driving. The CR-V's downsides include excessive road noise, large rear corner blind zones caused by the styling, and less than tidy at-the-limit handling.
-
April 29th, 2012 02:14 PM #35
-
April 29th, 2012 02:31 PM #36
How much is the CX5 again?
The CRV looks bigger in pictures, but I'd doubt if the difference is absolutely relevant in terms of interior space. The CX5 definitely lacks a bigger set of wheels, it looks ugly sporting that small-ish compact-like rims. So if you're planning to make it really good, consider changing the rims first.
Aesthetically-wise the CRV wins (personal opinion). But with its entry price, I find it a bit disappointing since I can't find any features that could justify the hefty price point.
Mazda makes solid vehicles, so I could really bet that the CX5 will be a joy to drive around town.
-
April 29th, 2012 03:07 PM #37
-
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 1,756
April 29th, 2012 03:16 PM #39
-
Blue-labeled Motolite Gold are factory-supplied OEM batteries with only 1 year warranty.
Cheaper brands than Motolite but reliable as well