Results 81 to 90 of 1418
-
-
Tsikot Member Rank 3
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 1,069
March 11th, 2007 12:06 PM #82
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 52
March 11th, 2007 02:33 PM #83
-
-
-
March 11th, 2007 08:36 PM #86
Pwede bang maki-singit? Marami kasi akong ideas, this post will be all over the place.
I have also thought about this problem, but from a totally different perspective. My perspective was, produce a cheap, fuel-efficient vehicle which can carry three people and their luggage.
You see, I was not thinking about an AUV replacement, but rather a city car, much like a Smart Car. I actually ended up parting out the thing (because I was planning to build it, all by myself!) and canvassing for prices.
Here was my concept:
1) the car is a space-frame design, not a monocoque (very hard to make) and not a body-on-frame
Space frame designs can be very strong, are relatively easy to manufacture, and are cheap. A lot of "kit cars" like Niky's favorites are space frames.
I know zero about mechanical engineering but I thought by constructing the space frame from schedule 40 1.5" thick EMT pipe it would be strong enough. If you look on instructables.com and bikesatwork.com there are lots of space frame designs there, including a bike trailer that can carry 400 lb of cargo.
2) the engine is a 5hp (!) Honda general-purpose engine, the G-200Q. This costs 9,300 pesos brand new.
The G-200Q consumes 290g of fuel per ps-hr. That means running at half-throttle 2.5 hp it consumes 725g of fuel per hour, which is roughly 1 liter of fuel. Assuming an average speed of 15 km/h which is the average speed in Metro Manila, that's 15 km/L. Not fantastic by a mile, but it can be lived with.
Since a lot of time is spent idling, the actual fuel efficiency will almost certainly be higher (heck a Honda City can do 15 km/L).
Now you can see why I was seriously thinking of building it myself... it is actually affordable enough for one person to build a prototype.
3) It has a two- or three-speed belt drive automatic transmission and a centrifugal clutch, as well as a differential. these parts come from go-karts and you can buy them on e-bay.
4) the engine is mounted at the back, and the rear suspension is a De Dion, just like the Smart car
5) it has ONE fat, shrouded wheel at the front for steering. there is no power steering.
so in essence, this thing I dreamed up of is a tricycle.
The problem I was unable to solve is how to put airconditioning on the thing. the G200 engine is too weak to power a regular car A/C.
on the other hand, a thermoelectric cooler is too expensive.
My idea is, space frame chassis, molded fiberglass body. I don't know how safe this thing would be though but a properly-constructed space frame is stronger than a unibody.
Finally: why did I not push through with building this thing? (I have no artistic skills, my plan was to have someone weld together the space frame, I would assemble the mechanical parts on it, and yun na yun)
You see, my motive for this whole design project was personal, I wanted a fuel-efficient small vehicle for city driving because my current (old) vehicle consumes lots of fuel. I set a budget of 50K. Kaya naman kung kaya. The thing is, you can buy a used Kia Pride for 50k, it will have a working aircon and will consume small amounts of fuel.
Kaya hindi siya worth it. Pero if you're building up a cottage car-making industry, worth it siya. I think the price should be 50k or at most 75k para within range of the scooters pa rin yung price niya. Above that... di na worth it.
Yung PHUV marami nga kaya na pasahero pero if it costs 300K up, middle class lang makaka-afford niyan. Look at how many scooters there are on the streets compared to jeepneys.
Also to repeat Niky's statement, mobility is empowering for the poor. a 300K or even 200K vehicle is out of reach of the poor. I'm in China right now and tambak tambak ang Chery QQ on the streets. Mukhang kawawa, belching blue smoke (baka mga 2-stroke yan or sobrang blowby na makina) pero they do empower their owners.
OK now to my comments on the PHUV discussion so far:
1) in order to have the pickup flat bed and large passenger capacity, I don't see how you can construct it EXCEPT as a body-on-frame design.
I think only Honda (Pilot) has managed to make a pickup that is not body-on-frame.
2) if it's body-on-frame, what makes it any different from the jeepneys we all see running around?
personally I've had enough of jeepneys. As Niky said in one of his posts, personal mobility enables the poor to uplift themselves. And for me personal mobility is not a 3-ton people hauler, it's a 3-passenger city car.
Just my 2c.Last edited by orly_andico; March 11th, 2007 at 08:45 PM.
-
March 11th, 2007 09:56 PM #87
As to Orli's Idea... it's a very old idea. I don't want to use the term "MY IDEA" - all ideas come from one source only.. all we do are innovations.
I want to share again another one of my este - Humanity's ideas... I hate to think that Pinoys are flagerrists and please let us all prove to the world that this impression is wrong. Let's strive to be the original.
I hope we can make the Filipinos dream once more... and have our own cultural identity at the same time - be empowered with our own car culture...
-
March 11th, 2007 10:12 PM #88
OK... sa affordability panalo . but are filipinos ready for this type of car?
-
March 11th, 2007 10:12 PM #89
oyil, dprox, Arhcitect rimski, orli, everyone... What do you think of these initial concepts... THis is what comes to my mind when you talk about cheapt PhUV design... pero practical
-
March 11th, 2007 10:18 PM #90
You're absolutely right.
That is one ugly mutha. Nobody would pay 50k or 75k for something like that.
But if it looked like a Smart Car... I think pwede na yun. The Smart Car also has interchangeable skins. Maganda yung concept nila na "Tridion Cell" which is basically the entire chassis tapos just hang the panels off it. Ang alam ko the Chinese are making a Smart Car lookalike na..
One can only hope.
Cheaper brands than Motolite but reliable as well