New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 201
  1. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    850
    #21
    Quote Originally Posted by userfriendly View Post
    The Chinese have a modern navy. Its big enough to threaten the US navy's dominance of asia. I found a article that said the Chinese navy can have as many as:

    6 nuclear attack subs
    54 diesel subs
    25 destroyers
    49 frigates
    85 missle armed patrol crafts
    55 landing ships
    3 nuclear missle subs
    145 aircraft
    34 helicopters

    Why would anyone want to mess with that?

    Restback ng Pilipinas Hopefully....

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Big_daddy View Post
    agree...medyo luma na rin yung gamit nya...more for coastal patrol sya instead of frontline blue water operations.
    too slow for coastal patrol

    smaller, lighter turbine patrol boats would have been better for that role

    like this particular columbian patrol boat
    Last edited by safeorigin; March 18th, 2011 at 06:22 PM.
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  3. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #23
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    P***, gas turbine engine, takaw sa fuel niyan. Mabuti pa speedboat na lang panghabol sa mga smuggler at illegal fishermen at abu sayyaf kesa naman antigwa na lumalamon ng gas!
    Fasten your seatbelt! Or else... Driven To Thrill!

  4. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #24
    they have both turbine and diesel engines

    diesel for long range cruise and turbine for dash

    but yeah, smaller vessels would benefit from this better
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  5. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    234
    #25
    di ba meron binigay sa atin na fast patrol craft...di ko sure if HK or US nagbigay...I think Pegasus class sya or something.

  6. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    21,384
    #26
    sana lagyan nila ng ganito.....


    gatling gun

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Big_daddy View Post
    di ba meron binigay sa atin na fast patrol craft...di ko sure if HK or US nagbigay...I think Pegasus class sya or something.
    royal navy peacock class yun

    navy corvette yun so medyo mabagalbagal pa

    chua, meron atang phalanx CIWS yung bagong acquire
    Last edited by safeorigin; March 19th, 2011 at 10:09 AM.
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  8. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    21,384
    #28
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    royal navy peacock class yun

    navy corvette yun so medyo mabagalbagal pa

    chua, meron atang phalanx CIWS yung bagong acquire
    ah ok....so iyon na pala yun.

  9. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    850
    #29
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhj8ITvp-pw"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhj8ITvp-pw[/ame]
    Last ditch effort lang ang Phalanx CIWS. If there are ten missiles coming your way, dasal ka na lang.

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #30
    nowadays, you wouldn't expect missiles to come in horizontally

    they would approach the target vertically since their velocity is augmented by gravity

    so whether you shoot them down or not, it will still hit you
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  11. Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,460
    #31
    IMO, adding one boat to our arsenal would barely put a dent on the Chinese navy. If we purchased 20-30 of those, then maybe the Chinese would at least get up and start taking us a little bit more seriously.

    We're on the right track, but the train is too slow.

  12. Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    178
    #32
    Quote Originally Posted by userfriendly View Post
    I am for the modernization of our armed forces, but getting a 46 year old boat hardly calls for celebration. Its an antique. Its older than most of the people in this forum. I can not understand how they can call getting 46 year old equipment as modernization.

    If we are a major ally of the US, they should at least give us better equipment. They have been scraping the older Perry class frigates. They have transfered them to Poland, Pakistan, Turkey and Egypt. They have scraped a few others. Why not give it to us instead of turing it to scrap. The Perry class frigate is a very capable modern design.

    Perry-class frigates are too expensive for us to operate. As far as I know the navy is already looking at obtaining several brand new hulls for its fleet (repeat: brand new, not second hand). In line with 2011 I think there is still the matter of at least 3 OPV/corvettes in the navy's acquisition plan. The problem with brand new ships is that it would take a few years for the manufacturer to assemble and deliver it for our use, and with the recent spat off Palawan the Hamilton is the best choice that we can use immediately and economically. It is a good platform for training our guys and it can patrol off the coast of Palawan for more than a month at a time.

  13. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    234
    #33
    Quote Originally Posted by hein View Post
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhj8ITvp-pw
    Last ditch effort lang ang Phalanx CIWS. If there are ten missiles coming your way, dasal ka na lang.
    Clear and Present Danger na movie yan...Morgan Freeman and Ben Affleck...not that realistic...una..there was nothing on the threat board...hence lowered alert status yung carrier...pangalawa...a carrier doesn't sail on her own...its escorted by lots of screen ships, in this case eh dapat may 1-2 Ticonderoga Cruisers or Arleigh Burke destroyers acting as escorts, ASW and Anti-Air screens.

    CIWS coupled with chaff/flares/decoys ang last effort...plus ship movement.

    Wala pa naman major carrier engagement after WWII...even during the Korean war eh walang major threat sa US carriers except for submarines.

    Its a high stakes game that nobody has played yet...if WWIII breaks out..then we'll know which will win...modern carriers or modern ASM's.
    Last edited by Big_daddy; April 7th, 2011 at 04:54 AM. Reason: made some changes

  14. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    234
    #34
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    nowadays, you wouldn't expect missiles to come in horizontally

    they would approach the target vertically since their velocity is augmented by gravity

    so whether you shoot them down or not, it will still hit you
    Paano yun...you shoot them down or not, it will still hit you? di ko makuha yung meaning.

    Are you saying na since almost vertical sya, kahit tamaan ng Aster 30 or Standard 3 ERM Block IV eh tatamaan pa rin yung target?

  15. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,306
    #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Big_daddy View Post
    Clear and Present Danger na movie yan...Morgan Freeman and Ben Affleck...not that realistic...
    Sum of All Fears yung movie. Nauna yung Clear and Present danger.

  16. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    234
    #36
    Quote Originally Posted by jonski View Post
    Sum of All Fears yung movie. Nauna yung Clear and Present danger.
    I stand corrected yung clear and present pala was about the drug lords...sorry OT.

  17. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #37
    parang pelikula na pala dito, hehehe
    Fasten your seatbelt! Or else... Driven To Thrill!

  18. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #38
    Quote Originally Posted by Big_daddy View Post
    Paano yun...you shoot them down or not, it will still hit you? di ko makuha yung meaning.

    Are you saying na since almost vertical sya, kahit tamaan ng Aster 30 or Standard 3 ERM Block IV eh tatamaan pa rin yung target?
    ever heard of ballistic missiles converted into anti-ship missiles? or multiple warheads? or the effectiveness of submarine launched missiles vs. interceptor missiles?

    in the 80's both sides figured out that by releasing multiple warheads, tracking systems can be duped into targeting the booster stage instead of the warhead per se since they're pretty much untrackable during reentry. a missile intercept can therefore only be done if there's data on the silo's location. this is also the reason why part of START is exchange of silo data. now, if it's from a submarine then there's less time to react especially if it's travelling at hypersonic speed.

    this is also partially the reason why DARPA is researched on FALCON HTV
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  19. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    234
    #39
    Yap, di ba eto yung meron yung China...IRBM that is tasked for anti-ship/carrier roles.

    So if this is the way of the future...then 90% ng mga ABM or Anti-Air/Anti-Cruise missiles eh obsolete na.

    So does this mean na puro CIWS na lang tulad ng US CIWS or Dutch Goalkeeper na lang ang effective?

  20. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #40
    nah, the angle of elevation for those systems are too narrow to engage something hitting you from directly above. besides, if let's say you intercepted one(assuming it's not MIRV), the ballistic missile debris would incapacitate a carrier's deck since it's like dropping rocks directly above paper boats
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Philippine Navy acquires Hamilton class patrol craft