New Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

**niky** · August 26th, 2012 05:21 PM

A decision is a decision. You can file an appeal to reverse an earlier decision, though... But I don't know if you can reverse an SC ruling... Except if you're PAL and the CJ is Corona, that is...

**CVT** · August 26th, 2012 05:49 PM

Am just thinking,- to be the CJ for the next 18years(?) is a long time....

16.7K:weathermanf2:>:sampay:

**chrismarte** · August 26th, 2012 08:13 PM

^^ Kung magiging independent ang SC ok ang 18years.

But if yung president eh magiging kadikit nya humanda sya siraan at gapangan.

**cast_no_shadow** · August 28th, 2012 02:44 PM

Originally Posted by dfopiso

first test nya, disallow foreign travel ni CGMA

btw, paano na yung mga nadesisyonan nung time ni CJ Corona? i-reverse lahat? so meron pang chance is M. Visconde?

kumusta na si SC spokesperson M. Marquez?

I assume si Midas pa din ang spokesperson. Permanent plantilla position yun kay midas.

**_Qwerty_** · August 28th, 2012 02:52 PM

di naman spokeperson posisyon ni midas.. deputy court administrator yang si midas..

Originally Posted by cast_no_shadow

I assume si Midas pa din ang spokesperson. Permanent plantilla position yun kay midas.

**ZENMasterTYL** · August 28th, 2012 02:59 PM

Originally Posted by cast_no_shadow

I assume si Midas pa din ang spokesperson. Permanent plantilla position yun kay midas.

co-terminus ang spokesperson sa CJ.

fulltime court admin na si marquez

**dfopiso** · August 29th, 2012 10:25 PM

will CJ Sereno reverse previous SC decisions she perceived questionable? cases like CGMA, HL, Visconde

**Altis6453** · August 29th, 2012 10:45 PM

^ The CJ can't reopen decided cases. It's called res judicata.

**wowiesy** · August 30th, 2012 08:38 AM

Unless it's still open? I think close issue na yung ibalik sa magsasaka.. ang naka pending pa due to MR (if I remember it correctly) is yung compensation na tatanggapin ng Cojuangco ... either valuation at 1989 prices or at 2006 ba yun if I'm not mistaken..

1989 ata yung dapat nai turnover na sa magsasaka yun..

2006 yung kung kailan naging final <?> yung decision or was it kung kailan nilabas yung decision revoking the SDO (if I remember it correctly yung time ni GMA at ang DAR Secretary then was si Pangandaman yata)...

so kung bukas pa issue ng compensation.. and Sereno had the opinion na dapat 2006 valuation... yan... maganda pag debatehan...

**Altis6453** · August 30th, 2012 09:13 AM

Originally Posted by wowiesy

Unless it's still open? I think close issue na yung ibalik sa magsasaka.. ang naka pending pa due to MR (if I remember it correctly) is yung compensation na tatanggapin ng Cojuangco ... either valuation at 1989 prices or at 2006 ba yun if I'm not mistaken..

1989 ata yung dapat nai turnover na sa magsasaka yun..

2006 yung kung kailan naging final <?> yung decision or was it kung kailan nilabas yung decision revoking the SDO (if I remember it correctly yung time ni GMA at ang DAR Secretary then was si Pangandaman yata)...

so kung bukas pa issue ng compensation.. and Sereno had the opinion na dapat 2006 valuation... yan... maganda pag debatehan...

Haven't heard if HLI or the Cojuangcos actually appealed that part of the decision (re: just compensation and valuation). If they did, then it is only an collateral issue while the main argument, that is, whether or not the land should be distributed to the farmers, has already been decided. AFAIK, there is good reason (including numerous decided cases) to argue that the taking or transfer of property should always be based on fair market value at the time of taking.