Isuzu cannot spend too much on developing its products. It's a problem that afflicts most specialized manufacturers whose products are catered to a specific segment of the market. That's why they rely on adding bells and whistles on some of their core products to try and keep them 'fresh' in the market. The original Crosswind is based on the Isuzu Fuego chassis from eons ago. It came out same time with the Adventure and Tamaraw FX Revo. Mitsubishi has already developed the Fusion (albeit with lukewarm market reception due to a lack of a diesel engine), and Toyota has already gone mid-cycle with the Innova. But Isuzu is still marketing the Crosswind. Now I'm not one to discount it on the fact of it being an old design (I'm a fan of the Land Rover Defender which is still based on the 1948 Series Rover). But I think Isuzu should try and put up with the times also. Airbags and ABS are welcome additions even as options or even at least 3point ELR belts on rear seats? Or the 100bhp engine of the Fuego where it was based from.
But Isuzu just keeps adding accessories to the units instead. Numerous LCD monitors, chrome trim, seat massagers, new stereo, new door trim, new spare tire cover, new wheel design, etc.

Same thing with Alterra. New monitors, change the headlamps, new wheels, etc. If it floats your boat, there's nothing wrong with it.
As for coils vs other forms of suspensions, I've already come from a torsion bar/leaf spring combo vehicle then moved to a torsion bar coil spring combo. Now I'm running four wheel coils on solid axles front and rear. It's a matter of preference I guess. And being aware that this class of vehicles handle differently than normal road cars is a plus also. I have yet to flip any of them despite the fact that the vehicles are being used both on and off road and in responding code 3 to emergency calls.
Bookmarks