New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 36 of 359 FirstFirst ... 263233343536373839404686136 ... LastLast
Results 701 to 720 of 7178
  1. Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,447
    #701
    Quote Originally Posted by TripleJ2012 View Post
    Hi PentelPen, Have you tried using the Cruise Control? what do you need to press first? "on" (in the center) or "set" (upper). Mine didn't work when i tried it yesterday..i pressed "on" but got no response. thanks for the feedback.
    on then go to your desire speed then press set

  2. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    52
    #702
    Tama lang ang price ng bt 50 iba talaga ang hatak at response ng 3.2 plus may hilldescent control oa. At iba ang interior ng bt50 compared sa xlt 4x2 na ranger. Kahit mas mataas ang 4x2 bt 50 compare mo na lang ang added features na dinagdag kaya mahal. Pero malaki talaga difference ng 3.2 kung may budget ka mag 3.2 kna iba talaga ang hatak.

  3. Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    375
    #703
    Quote Originally Posted by doublej View Post
    Tama lang ang price ng bt 50 iba talaga ang hatak at response ng 3.2 plus may hilldescent control oa. At iba ang interior ng bt50 compared sa xlt 4x2 na ranger. Kahit mas mataas ang 4x2 bt 50 compare mo na lang ang added features na dinagdag kaya mahal. Pero malaki talaga difference ng 3.2 kung may budget ka mag 3.2 kna iba talaga ang hatak.
    Why you would compare the 2.2 XLT to the 3.2 BT-50 is beyond me! Compare the 3.2 Wildtrak to the 3.2 BT-50. Iba rin ang interior ng 3.2 Ranger sa xlt 4.2.

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,425
    #704
    I believe 2.2 xlt were originally intended as fleet pickup..

  5. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,800
    #705
    Quote Originally Posted by TholitzReloaded View Post
    I believe 2.2 xlt were originally intended as fleet pickup..
    I'm not sure about that, since its pretty much loaded, it even has Rain-sensing wipers, Bluetooth Connectivity and Voice Control.

    Quote Originally Posted by doublej
    Tama lang ang price ng bt 50 iba talaga ang hatak at response ng 3.2 plus may hilldescent control oa. At iba ang interior ng bt50 compared sa xlt 4x2 na ranger. Kahit mas mataas ang 4x2 bt 50 compare mo na lang ang added features na dinagdag kaya mahal. Pero malaki talaga difference ng 3.2 kung may budget ka mag 3.2 kna iba talaga ang hatak.
    The Ranger and BT-50 are mechanically identical (2.2 vs 2.2, 3.2 vs 3.2) and are more or less the same under the skin, unlike the previous generation models which were developed by Mazda, the new models were developed by Ford.
    Hill Descent Control is only for the 4x4 model. Just like the 4x2 Ranger XLT, the 4x2 BT-50 has no Hill Descent Control.
    Out of curiosity, does the local spec BT-50 have Bluetooth Connectivity and Voice Control?
    Last edited by AG4; August 15th, 2012 at 01:50 PM.

  6. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    52
    #706
    Yes meron lahat na basa 2.2 xlt meron sa 2.2 bt 50 loaded dn plus leather seats, hill lauch assist at dynamic stability control. Kaya mas mahal.

  7. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    46
    #707
    to those who have their rangers installed with back-up sensor at alabang (i forgot the shop) pa post naman po ng pics. I just want to have an idea on how it was installed kasi nga sabi dito sa forum mahirap lagyan pag naka chrome ang bumper. I'm planning to buy this truck kasi by early next year para mas available na din yung mga accessories and ito ang una kong gusto ipa install. Mahirap umatras kasi pag malaki oto tapos di mo nakikita. We have a field master din tapos walang back-up sensor medyo mahirap lalo na sa mga maliit na kalye tapos mag backing ka. sa small car ko may ganito ang dali ng buhay eh. hehe. thanks tsikot.

  8. Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    56
    #708
    The voice command is tricky in some way... or its just a matter of getting use to

  9. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    52
    #709
    Nakalimutan ko may built in dn pala na back up sensor ang bt 50 aside sa added features kaya mas mahal. Yung 2.2 compared sa 2.2 xlt. Engine and performance pareho lang. Same platform.

  10. Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    375
    #710
    Di ko lang talaga masikmura yung tail lights ng Bt-50 why oh why

    Anyway siguro because of the BT-50 3.2 mas mapapa aga yung Wildtrak ko

  11. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    19
    #711
    Cyferion: +1 di ko rin gusto yung tail lights ng BT-50. wala pa ko nakikita sa kalsada pero mukang maganda rin ang BT-50 depende nalang sa titingin

    mar38: di ko na rin ginagamit yung voice command ang lakas eh naaadjust ba yung volume nun? di ko mahanap eh

    may alam ba kayo kung meron na lumabas ng soft tonneau, weather shield pati bonnet protector ng ranger?

  12. Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    766
    #712
    Quote Originally Posted by doublej View Post
    Nakalimutan ko may built in dn pala na back up sensor ang bt 50 aside sa added features kaya mas mahal. Yung 2.2 compared sa 2.2 xlt. Engine and performance pareho lang. Same platform.
    pero come to think of it, comparing the 2.2 M/T variants of Ranger and BT-50, 1.300m for the BT-50 and 1.069m for the Ranger XLT.

    for 230k difference, you would have:

    - Dual zone Auto climate
    - leather seats
    - stability control
    - parking sensors

    unless you desperately need the stability control, it is not worth the 230k IMHO, it does not justify the 230k difference. mga 100k lang dapat. not to mention you will also loose the Macho truck looks of the Ranger. the interior is better on the BT-50 for me.

    for the 4x4 BT-50 * 1.490m, I would gladly wait nalang for the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4x4 * 1.519m. more features, better exterior appearance with the sportier set-up and the 18" rims.


  13. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    29
    #713
    Time to upgrade your ranger...

    delta4x4 | Facebook
    Ford Ranger Kentros | Facebook

  14. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #714
    Quote Originally Posted by ratchet23 View Post
    pero come to think of it, comparing the 2.2 M/T variants of Ranger and BT-50, 1.300m for the BT-50 and 1.069m for the Ranger XLT.

    for 230k difference, you would have:

    - Dual zone Auto climate
    - leather seats
    - stability control
    - parking sensors

    unless you desperately need the stability control, it is not worth the 230k IMHO, it does not justify the 230k difference. mga 100k lang dapat. not to mention you will also loose the Macho truck looks of the Ranger. the interior is better on the BT-50 for me.

    for the 4x4 BT-50 * 1.490m, I would gladly wait nalang for the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4x4 * 1.519m. more features, better exterior appearance with the sportier set-up and the 18" rims.

    Seems like the strategy is to make the 2.2 BT-50 better than the ranger spec-wise and then do the reverse for the 3.2 engine.

  15. Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    375
    #715
    Quote Originally Posted by PRPB View Post



    Don't think a BT-50 can ever look this badass

  16. Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    336
    #716
    I don,t own both trucks mentioned, pero I respect your choices, nasa tumitingin yan eh, kung ano maganda sa kanya. Ang ok sa yo, sa iba naman hindi, kaya kanya kanya lang yan.

  17. Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    97
    #717
    Hi Everyone I am new here. I was wondering about the airbags. I went to my ford dealer today and I looked at the ranger. I was surprised it had only 2 airbags. Totoo ba ito? I looked at the website and it advertises more airbags. Any has the same concern as me?

  18. Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    4,631
    #718
    The Ford Philippines website mentions only two airbags for the new Ranger: driver and passenger.

    Baka sa European spec or Wildtrak variant yung nabasa mo, with the side curtain and knee airbags.
    Last edited by Bogeyman; August 16th, 2012 at 11:43 PM.

  19. Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    97
    #719

  20. Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    97
    #720

2012 Ford Ranger