Results 61 to 70 of 232
-
October 16th, 2012 07:47 AM #61
-
October 16th, 2012 10:01 AM #62
Compared to the SG, I think justifiable yung cost ng SF a/t na 1.7. You get a far better engine and all those other toys. What SG has better is seat number Ü then again one's a crossover and the other's a van, justification or reason to get for each is very different.
-
October 16th, 2012 10:06 AM #63
2013 SF din ako...pricing is good para hindi masyado madami sa streets
-
-
October 16th, 2012 01:08 PM #65
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 754
October 16th, 2012 01:22 PM #66I don't think the Trailblazer can match the ride comfort of Sta Fe because the Colorado's ride loses out to Hilux in Australia. If they changed the suspension of the Trailblazer, then we can compare.
-
October 17th, 2012 12:16 AM #67
The analysis is incorrect. The suspension of the Trailblazer is not the same as the Colorado.
Colorado
front: Independent, double wishbone with torsion bar and gas shock absorbers
rear: Leaf spring with half oval steel pads with gas shock absorbers
Trailblazer
front:Independent, double wishbone with torsion bar and gas shock absorbers
rear: 5 Link coil rear suspension
sources:
http://en.chevrolet.co.th/bypass/gmn..._EN_140912.pdf
http://en.chevrolet.co.th/bypass/gmn...DF-English.pdf
-
October 17th, 2012 12:42 AM #68
-
October 17th, 2012 12:47 AM #69
ladder framer.
I'd agree that a softroader like the SF would be a gentler option compared to the TBZ. Comparing the LTZ's suspension and ride comfort to the MS or even the Fort, now that's something I'd be interested to experience.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 754
sinabi moh! i hardly see my children now. when they were young, schedules were more predictable.
Traffic!