Results 671 to 680 of 2535
-
Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 4
January 8th, 2012 05:22 PM #671mga sir any contact no. po kay sir edwin? dikopo kasi alam name nya dito. bago lang po kasi thanks.
-
January 9th, 2012 05:39 PM #672
-
January 10th, 2012 01:03 AM #673
Share lang.. result ng last session. Collinite 915 last layer ko. Nagtataka ako kasi ngayon ko lang nakita na ganyan kakintab yung Tucson kahit ilang beses ko na nagawa yung ganun session. Haha!
Water beading.
Medyo nasayang lang dahil sa weather nung Sunday.
-
January 10th, 2012 06:33 PM #674
-
January 11th, 2012 09:16 AM #675
*SG: nice work, as always!
1) yung mga mainstream rubbing compounds and "scratch removers" are usually designed to be very abrasive so that they can be hand applied. Yes, tanggal yung visible scratch, pero ubos ang clearcoat mo. And surebol puro swirl mark due to the size of their particles.
One of the better products is meg's ultimate compound or scratch/swirlX - the abrasive particles are finer so it leaves far fewer swirl marks.
the mom's product, if I remember correctly, still uses diminishing particles - meaning the large particles get broken down as you work the product - which in turn means that you will have to work the product as follows: i)increasing the pressure, then ii)deceasing the pressure.
2) "spot removal" causes uneven clearcoat wear within a panel. it's better to wait for your yearly full detailing session, para pantay pantay ang wear ng clearcoat.
may sumusi sa mazda 2 namin sa isang quarter panel. P!*#!*$!*# pero ganun talaga. at the moment I'm just ignoring it and using products with significant swirl filling just to lessen its visibility.
I suggest leaving it alone sir, to better preserve the clearcoat
-
January 11th, 2012 11:20 AM #676
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 965
January 11th, 2012 01:23 PM #677It's a compound - hehe, that probably doesn't help much does it? I guess what I'm trying to say is that, unlike the older rubbing and polishing compounds, the results you get from Ultimate Compound are very dependent on pressure and working time, and this has to do with the abrasive technology that doc mentioned.
Older compounds use diminishing abrasives - you have abrasives of a certain size, and as you work the product, the abrasives break down, helping to leave a finer finish. For products like this, the initial size of the abrasive helps determine the amount of cut the product has - larger abrasives will cut more, but will also leave more marring that will need to be further refined by a finer polish.
Meguiar's Ultimate Compound uses super-micro abrasives - these are very fine abrasives that do not need to be broken down, and retain their cut over the polishing cycle. For these products, you get more cut by adding more abrasives to the mix (say Ultimate Compound vs Ultimate Polish), and you also get more paint removal by working the product longer, and with more pressure (unlike diminishing abrasives, which can only be worked until they break down). So you have a product where the cut goes from a medium to heavy compound all the way to a light polish, depending on the working time and amount of pressure that you use.
-
January 11th, 2012 02:19 PM #678
-
January 11th, 2012 02:32 PM #679
-
January 11th, 2012 02:41 PM #680
Somewhat expected from a rushed car from a first time carmaker
Xiaomi E-Car